The International Society of Equitation Science Committee Reports
    A comparison between  the Monty Roberts technique and the conventional UK technique for initial  training of riding horses
      Solvang, CA (October 3, 2011) – On the  30th of August 2011 the scientific paper  authored by Drs. Veronica  Fowler, Mark Kennedy and David Marlin entitled ‘A comparison between the Monty  Roberts technique and a conventional UK technique for initial training of  riding horses’ was accepted for publication in Anthrozoös. Anthrozoös is a  quarterly, peer-reviewed multidisciplinary journal reporting the interactions  of people and animals, a journal which has enjoyed a distinguished history as a  pioneer in the field since its launch in 1987. Prior to appearing in print in Anthrozoös  the study will be presented at the International Society of Equitation Science  (ISES) having been accepted by the scientific committee and also presented at  the Centre for Animal Welfare & Anthrozoology, Department of Veterinary  Medicine University of Cambridge both in October this year.
     Comment from Dr Veronica Fowler on the results of  the study:
     This study describes a comparison of the efficacy  of the Monty Roberts horsemanship technique in comparison to a UK conventional  training technique for the initial training of horses. Initial training of  young horses, in particular the first time a horse is saddled and ridden has  been recently reported in the scientific literature as a significant stressor  in terms of the impact on the welfare of the horse. It is therefore vital that  we fully evaluate the techniques which are practiced around the world to  identify those which have the potential to cause compromised welfare and  suffering during foundation training of horses. 
      Our study reports that horses trained using Monty  Robert’s methods had significantly lower maximum heart rates (bpm) during both  first saddle and first rider when compared to a UK conventional training  method. Monty Roberts trained horses did have significantly lower heart rates  during first saddle and first rider backing process (i.e. heart rate reduced  between first saddle and first rider), a finding which has never previously  been reported in the scientific literature. Thus the heart rates observed from Monty  Roberts trained horses during first saddle and first rider are currently the  lowest reported for any training regime reported in the literature to date.
     The use of the round pen and in particular the  technique of Join-up have been frequently criticised and reported in the  literature to be another significant stressor due to the perceived opinion that  this environment and method overtly activates the flight response. Our study  could find no evidence that the use of the round pen or, indeed the technique  of Join-up, was fear inducing and thus a significant stressor to the horse  based on heart rate alone. In fact, we found that the heart rate of horses  during this technique were considerably below the maximum heart rate for horses  of this age and breed.
     Following 20 days of training (30  minutes/horse/day) the study horses undertook a standardised ridden obstacle  and flatwork test and a ridden freestyle test. Heart rates recorded during  these tests for both training regimes were not significantly different; however  Monty Robert’s trained horses scored significantly higher in all three tests as  determined by a panel of judges who were unaware of the study or the trainers  involved in the study. 
    Our manuscript therefore provides peer reviewed  scientific substance to indicate that that the Monty Roberts training technique  is highly efficacious in terms of the effect on the welfare and performance of  the horse undergoing foundation training. 
    [close]